R. v. Hazout
Court headnote
R. v. Hazout Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2006-10-05 Neutral citation 2006 SCC 42 Report [2006] 2 SCR 361 Case number 31129 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Rothstein, Marshall On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 31129 Decision Content SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Hazout, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 361, 2006 SCC 42 Date: 20061005 Docket: 31129 Between: Marc Hazout Appellant and Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Fish and Rothstein JJ. Reasons for Judgment: (para. 1) The Court ______________________________ R. v. Hazout, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 361, 2006 SCC 42 Marc Hazout Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Hazout Neutral citation: 2006 SCC 42. File No.: 31129. 2006: June 22; 2006: October 5. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Fish and Rothstein JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law — Appeals to Supreme Court of Canada — Appeal as of right — No dissent on question of law alone — Appeal quashed. Held: The appeal should be quashed. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (Weiler, Simmons and Gillese JJ.A.) (2005), 199 C.C.C. (3d) 474, 201 O.A.C. 235, [2005] O.J. No. 3550 (QL), upholding the accused’s convictions. Appeal quashed. Marie Henein and Jennifer Gleitman, for the appellant. Robert …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Hazout Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2006-10-05 Neutral citation 2006 SCC 42 Report [2006] 2 SCR 361 Case number 31129 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Rothstein, Marshall On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 31129 Decision Content SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Hazout, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 361, 2006 SCC 42 Date: 20061005 Docket: 31129 Between: Marc Hazout Appellant and Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Fish and Rothstein JJ. Reasons for Judgment: (para. 1) The Court ______________________________ R. v. Hazout, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 361, 2006 SCC 42 Marc Hazout Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Hazout Neutral citation: 2006 SCC 42. File No.: 31129. 2006: June 22; 2006: October 5. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Fish and Rothstein JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law — Appeals to Supreme Court of Canada — Appeal as of right — No dissent on question of law alone — Appeal quashed. Held: The appeal should be quashed. Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (Weiler, Simmons and Gillese JJ.A.) (2005), 199 C.C.C. (3d) 474, 201 O.A.C. 235, [2005] O.J. No. 3550 (QL), upholding the accused’s convictions. Appeal quashed. Marie Henein and Jennifer Gleitman, for the appellant. Robert Gattrell, for the respondent. The following is the judgment delivered by 1 The Court — We are of the view that the dissent relied upon by the appellant as the foundation of his appeal as of right under s. 691(1) (a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 , cannot be construed as a dissent on a question of law alone. Accordingly, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal without leave, which in this case was not sought. The appeal is quashed. Appeal quashed. Solicitors for the appellant: Henein & Associates, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506