Sauvageau v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)
Court headnote
Sauvageau v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-08-07 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 316 File numbers A-526-00 Decision Content Date: 20030807 Docket: A-526-00 Citation: 2003 FCA 316 Between: CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU Plaintiff and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment in writing of costs owed the defendants pursuant to the judgment of April 15, 2002, dismissing the application for judicial review with costs. [2] In his submissions the defendant objected to the plaintiff's motion to stay the assessment pending settlement of the case before the Canadian Human Rights Commission. I consider that the defendants have been entitled to be paid their costs since the date of the Federal Court of Appeal judgment, as there is nothing in the Federal Court Act nor the Federal Court Rules (1998) which allows me to stay the execution of the order. [3] As the various claims are reasonable, all the fees, except for those requested under items 4, 26 and 27 of Tariff B, are allowed as such in an amount of $1,430.00. The request under item 4 for preparation of the motion is denied as the Court did not rule on the question of costs in its order of February 22, 2001. An amount of $220.00 is awarded under item 26, since this was a simple assessment with little dispute. No costs are allowed for preparation of the …
Read full judgment
Sauvageau v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-08-07 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 316 File numbers A-526-00 Decision Content Date: 20030807 Docket: A-526-00 Citation: 2003 FCA 316 Between: CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU Plaintiff and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment in writing of costs owed the defendants pursuant to the judgment of April 15, 2002, dismissing the application for judicial review with costs. [2] In his submissions the defendant objected to the plaintiff's motion to stay the assessment pending settlement of the case before the Canadian Human Rights Commission. I consider that the defendants have been entitled to be paid their costs since the date of the Federal Court of Appeal judgment, as there is nothing in the Federal Court Act nor the Federal Court Rules (1998) which allows me to stay the execution of the order. [3] As the various claims are reasonable, all the fees, except for those requested under items 4, 26 and 27 of Tariff B, are allowed as such in an amount of $1,430.00. The request under item 4 for preparation of the motion is denied as the Court did not rule on the question of costs in its order of February 22, 2001. An amount of $220.00 is awarded under item 26, since this was a simple assessment with little dispute. No costs are allowed for preparation of the notice of appearance under Rule 305 as this is not covered in the Tariff. Item 27 gives the assessment officer discretion to award fees for services rendered when those are exceptional and justified. It should be borne in mind that the assessment of party-and-party costs based on the Tariff is a partial set-off. [4] The disbursements incurred for costs of service, photocopies and typing of transcript are allowed in the amount of $958.16, as they were proven by affidavit. [5] The defendants' costs are accordingly assessed in the amount of $2,388.16. A certificate is issued in that amount. "Michelle Lamy" Assessment Officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC August 7, 2003 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Date: 20030807 Docket: A-526-00 BETWEEN: CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU Plaintiff and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: A-526-00 Between: CLAUDE H. SAUVAGEAU Plaintiff and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: August 7, 2003 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg for the defendants Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca