Leblanc v. The Queen
Court headnote
Leblanc v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1982-03-18 Report [1982] 1 SCR 344 Case number 15864 Judges Laskin, Bora; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Leblanc v. The Queen, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 344 Date: 1982-03-18 André Leblanc Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 15864. 1982: March 2; 1982: March 18. Present: Laskin C.J. and Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR QUEBEC Criminal law—Breach of trust by a municipal officer—Municipal corruption—Criminal Code, ss. lll, 112(1)(f). APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec affirming the conviction of appellant. Appeal dismissed. Clément N. Beauchamp, for the appellant. Michel Pothier, for the respondent. THE COURT—We are all in agreement with the reasons for judgment of Kaufman and Lamer JJ. A., of the Quebec Court of Appeal, reported at [1979] C.A. 417. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Clément N. Beau-champ, Hull. Solicitor for the respondent: Michel Pothier, Montreal. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Leblanc v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1982-03-18 Report [1982] 1 SCR 344 Case number 15864 Judges Laskin, Bora; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Leblanc v. The Queen, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 344 Date: 1982-03-18 André Leblanc Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. File No.: 15864. 1982: March 2; 1982: March 18. Present: Laskin C.J. and Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR QUEBEC Criminal law—Breach of trust by a municipal officer—Municipal corruption—Criminal Code, ss. lll, 112(1)(f). APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec affirming the conviction of appellant. Appeal dismissed. Clément N. Beauchamp, for the appellant. Michel Pothier, for the respondent. THE COURT—We are all in agreement with the reasons for judgment of Kaufman and Lamer JJ. A., of the Quebec Court of Appeal, reported at [1979] C.A. 417. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Clément N. Beau-champ, Hull. Solicitor for the respondent: Michel Pothier, Montreal.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506