Fournier v. Canada (Solicitor General)
Source text
Fournier v. Canada (Solicitor General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-09-17 Neutral citation 2003 FC 1079 File numbers T-750-02 Decision Content Date: 20030917 Docket: T-750-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1079 EDMONTON, ALBERTA, WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003. Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN BETWEEN: LUC FOURNIER Applicant - and - THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] In considering this application for judicial review of the Correctional Service of Canada Final Level Grievance Decision dated October 17, 2001, which disciplined the applicant with a financial penalty of two days' pay for pushing a desk in a manner to cause injury to a fellow correctional officer, and for disrespectful and abusive comments to that fellow correctional officer; [2] AND UPON the Court concluding that the decision to investigate the matter as a breach of discipline, as opposed to a case of harassment and discrimination in the workplace, was reasonably and legally open to the respondent; [3] AND UPON the Court concluding there was no failure to observe a principle of natural justice, procedural fairness or other procedure that was required by law. In particular, the respondent had the procedural right to investigate the complaint as a breach of the disciplinary code established by Commissioners' Directive 60, rather than a breach of the harassment and discrimination code established by Commissioner's Directive 255, which would ha…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Fournier v. Canada (Solicitor General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-09-17 Neutral citation 2003 FC 1079 File numbers T-750-02 Decision Content Date: 20030917 Docket: T-750-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1079 EDMONTON, ALBERTA, WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003. Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN BETWEEN: LUC FOURNIER Applicant - and - THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] In considering this application for judicial review of the Correctional Service of Canada Final Level Grievance Decision dated October 17, 2001, which disciplined the applicant with a financial penalty of two days' pay for pushing a desk in a manner to cause injury to a fellow correctional officer, and for disrespectful and abusive comments to that fellow correctional officer; [2] AND UPON the Court concluding that the decision to investigate the matter as a breach of discipline, as opposed to a case of harassment and discrimination in the workplace, was reasonably and legally open to the respondent; [3] AND UPON the Court concluding there was no failure to observe a principle of natural justice, procedural fairness or other procedure that was required by law. In particular, the respondent had the procedural right to investigate the complaint as a breach of the disciplinary code established by Commissioners' Directive 60, rather than a breach of the harassment and discrimination code established by Commissioner's Directive 255, which would have necessitated specially trained harassment complaint assessors for the investigation; [4] AND UPON the Court concluding that the applicant was properly and fairly notified in writing about the disciplinary investigation into the complaint; [5] AND UPON the Court concluding that the investigation was thorough, open and fair; [6] AND UPON the Court concluding that the findings of fact in the decision under review were not made in a perverse or capricious manner, or without regard for the material before the decision maker; ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that this application for judicial review be dismissed with costs. "Michael A. Kelen" Judge FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-750-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: LUC FOURNIER v. THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, AB DATE OF HEARING: September 17, 2003 REASONS FOR ORDER : KELEN, J DATED: September 17, 2003 APPEARANCES: Ms. Melodi Ulku FOR APPLICANT Mr. Rick Garvin FOR RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Bishop & MacKenzie LLP Edmonton, AB FOR APPLICANT Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, ON FOR RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80