Hewson v. R.
Court headnote
Hewson v. R. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1978-02-08 Report [1978] 2 SCR 111 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Spence, Wishart Flett; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hewson v. R., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 111 Date: 1978-02-08 Jon Hewson (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. 1978: February 7, 8. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz, Estey and Pratte JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Criminal law—Theft under $200—Appeal—No reversible error. APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of appeal for Ontario dismissing without recorded reasons an appeal from a judgment of Richards, Prov. Ct. J., convicting appellant of theft under $200. J. Lockyer and M. Winter, for the appellant. Murray Segal, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you Mr. Segal. We are all of the opinion that no reversible error is revealed in the record and in the judgment at trial as confirmed by a majority of the Court of Appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: Charles C. Roach, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Hewson v. R. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1978-02-08 Report [1978] 2 SCR 111 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Spence, Wishart Flett; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hewson v. R., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 111 Date: 1978-02-08 Jon Hewson (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen (Defendant) Respondent. 1978: February 7, 8. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz, Estey and Pratte JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. Criminal law—Theft under $200—Appeal—No reversible error. APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of appeal for Ontario dismissing without recorded reasons an appeal from a judgment of Richards, Prov. Ct. J., convicting appellant of theft under $200. J. Lockyer and M. Winter, for the appellant. Murray Segal, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you Mr. Segal. We are all of the opinion that no reversible error is revealed in the record and in the judgment at trial as confirmed by a majority of the Court of Appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: Charles C. Roach, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506