Pascal v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Pascal v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-11-24 Neutral citation 2004 FC 1651 File numbers T-1262-03 Decision Content Date: 20041124 Docket: T-1262-03 Citation: 2004 FC 1651 Between: JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment in writing of the respondent's costs following an order by the Court on April 13, 2004, affirming the decision of Prothonotary Richard Morneau, allowing the motion to strike the application for judicial review, with costs. The judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal on July 23, 2004, in no way alters the decisions made in the case at bar, though it terminates the appeal filed by Jean Claude Pascal in case A-257-04. [2] Based on the submissions of the parties, the respondent's fees are set in the amount of $660 for the following Tariff B items: item 5 (4 units), item 6 (1 unit) and item 25 (1 unit). No compensation can be awarded by an assessment officer under item 24 without an order by the Court to that effect. Further, the disbursements sought under paragraph 1(3)(b) of Tariff B are denied, as it is unlikely that the Attorney General of Canada would have to pay taxes on services rendered by counsel for the Department of Justice Canada as representing the Crown. [3] The respondent's costs in this case are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $660. A certificate is issued for tha…
Read full judgment
Pascal v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-11-24 Neutral citation 2004 FC 1651 File numbers T-1262-03 Decision Content Date: 20041124 Docket: T-1262-03 Citation: 2004 FC 1651 Between: JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment in writing of the respondent's costs following an order by the Court on April 13, 2004, affirming the decision of Prothonotary Richard Morneau, allowing the motion to strike the application for judicial review, with costs. The judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal on July 23, 2004, in no way alters the decisions made in the case at bar, though it terminates the appeal filed by Jean Claude Pascal in case A-257-04. [2] Based on the submissions of the parties, the respondent's fees are set in the amount of $660 for the following Tariff B items: item 5 (4 units), item 6 (1 unit) and item 25 (1 unit). No compensation can be awarded by an assessment officer under item 24 without an order by the Court to that effect. Further, the disbursements sought under paragraph 1(3)(b) of Tariff B are denied, as it is unlikely that the Attorney General of Canada would have to pay taxes on services rendered by counsel for the Department of Justice Canada as representing the Crown. [3] The respondent's costs in this case are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $660. A certificate is issued for that amount. (signed) MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC November 24, 2004 Certified true translation K.A. Harvey FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: T-1262-03 Between: JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: November 24, 2004 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca