R. v. Bird

R. v. Bird
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
2009-12-18
Neutral citation
2009 SCC 60
Report
[2009] 3 SCR 638
Case number
33054
Judges
McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Criminal law
Notes
SCC Case Information: 33054
Decision Content
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Citation: R. v. Bird, 2009 SCC 60, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 638
Date: 20091218
Docket: 33054
Between:
Her Majesty The Queen
Appellant
and
Stephanie Rosa Bird
Respondent
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.
Reasons for Judgment:
(paras. 1 to 2)
The Court
______________________________
R. v. Bird, 2009 SCC 60, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 638
Her Majesty The Queen Appellant
v.
Stephanie Rosa Bird Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. Bird
Neutral citation: 2009 SCC 60.
File No.: 33054.
2009: December 11; 2009: December 18.
Present: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta
Criminal law — Defences — Abandonment — Accused charged with first degree murder, kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault — Trial judge finding air of reality to defence of abandonment and convicting accused of manslaughter, kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault — Court of Appeal erring in dismissing Crown’s appeal from manslaughter conviction — Evidence incapable of supporting defence of abandonment — Facts as found by trial judge clearly establishing planned and deliberate murder — Conviction for manslaughter set aside and conviction for first degree murder entered.
Held: The appeal should be allowed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (Berger and Costigan JJ.A. and Sulyma J. (ad hoc)), 2009 ABCA 45, 2 Alta. L.R. (5th) 88, 448 A.R. 124, 447 W.A.C. 124, 243 C.C.C. (3d) 419, [2009] A.J. No. 107 (QL), 2009 CarswellAlta 157, upholding the accused’s conviction for manslaughter entered by Ross J., 2007 ABQB 289, 416 A.R. 223, [2007] A.J. No. 765 (QL), 2007 CarswellAlta 599. Appeal allowed.
Susan D. Hughson, Q.C., and Joanne Dartana, for the appellant.
Colleen M. Connolly, for the respondent.
The following is the judgment delivered by
[1] The Court — We agree with Costigan J.A., dissenting, that the evidence was incapable of supporting the defence of abandonment. No other defence arises on the facts.
[2] The appeal is therefore allowed and the conviction for manslaughter is set aside. As the facts found by the trial judge clearly establish that the murder was planned and deliberate, and involved the unlawful confinement of the victim at the time of the killing, a conviction for first degree murder is entered.
Appeal allowed.
Solicitor for the appellant: Attorney General of Alberta, Edmonton.
Solicitors for the respondent: Bokenfohr & Connolly, Edmonton.