Nadeau v. Canada (Revenue Agency)
Source text
Nadeau v. Canada (Revenue Agency) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2018-11-20 Neutral citation 2018 FCA 214 File numbers A-325-17 Decision Content Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. BETWEEN: SOPHIE NADEAU Applicant and CANADA REVENUE AGENCY Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. Judgment delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. BETWEEN: SOPHIE NADEAU Applicant and CANADA REVENUE AGENCY Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018.) NADON J.A. [1] Considering that the reasonableness standard is the applicable standard in this case, we are of the view that intervention is unwarranted. [2] In other words, the applicant failed to demonstrate the unreasonableness of the September 26, 2017 decision by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (2017 FPSLREB 27) dismissing the grievance that she had filed against her employer alleging that the employer had breached its duty to accommodate and had discriminated against her by changing her employment status from full-time to part-time. [3] Therefore, the application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $2,500.00,…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Nadeau v. Canada (Revenue Agency) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2018-11-20 Neutral citation 2018 FCA 214 File numbers A-325-17 Decision Content Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. BETWEEN: SOPHIE NADEAU Applicant and CANADA REVENUE AGENCY Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. Judgment delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. BETWEEN: SOPHIE NADEAU Applicant and CANADA REVENUE AGENCY Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018.) NADON J.A. [1] Considering that the reasonableness standard is the applicable standard in this case, we are of the view that intervention is unwarranted. [2] In other words, the applicant failed to demonstrate the unreasonableness of the September 26, 2017 decision by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (2017 FPSLREB 27) dismissing the grievance that she had filed against her employer alleging that the employer had breached its duty to accommodate and had discriminated against her by changing her employment status from full-time to part-time. [3] Therefore, the application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $2,500.00, inclusive of taxes and disbursements. “M Nadon” J.A. Certified true translation Janine Anderson, Revisor FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-325-17 STYLE OF CAUSE: SOPHIE NADEAU v. CANADA REVENUE AGENCY PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: November 20, 2018 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: Jean-Michel Corbeil For the Applicant Pierre-Marc Champagne For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP Ottawa, Ontario For the Applicant Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80