Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Kassam v. Canada

2004 FCA 332
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Kassam v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-10-05 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 332 File numbers A-137-03 Decision Content Date: 20041005 Docket: A-137-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 332 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MOEZ KASSAM Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF CANADA/ EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION Respondents Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 4, 2004. Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 5, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NADON, MALONE JJ.A. Date: 20041005 Docket: A-137-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 332 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: MOEZ KASSAM Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF CANADA/ EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT DÉCARY J.A. [1] This application for judicial review cannot succeed. [2] The arguments raised by the applicant are substantially similar to those raised and rejected in companion files A-134-03, A-135-03 and A-136-03. It will be sufficient for the purpose of this application to refer to the reasons issued this day in those files. [3] The application should be dismissed with costs, but since files A-134-03, A-135-03, A-136-03 and A-137-03 were heard together by the Court, there should be one set of costs only with respect to the hearing. (Sgd.) "Robert Décary" J.A. "I agree" (Sgd.) "Marc…

Read full judgment
Kassam v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-10-05
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 332
File numbers
A-137-03
Decision Content
Date: 20041005
Docket: A-137-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 332
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
MOEZ KASSAM
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF CANADA/
EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION
Respondents
Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 4, 2004.
Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 5, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: NADON, MALONE JJ.A.
Date: 20041005
Docket: A-137-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 332
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
MOEZ KASSAM
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR CANADA
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OF CANADA/
EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] This application for judicial review cannot succeed.
[2] The arguments raised by the applicant are substantially similar to those raised and rejected in companion files A-134-03, A-135-03 and A-136-03. It will be sufficient for the purpose of this application to refer to the reasons issued this day in those files.
[3] The application should be dismissed with costs, but since files A-134-03, A-135-03, A-136-03 and A-137-03 were heard together by the Court, there should be one set of costs only with respect to the hearing.
(Sgd.) "Robert Décary"
J.A.
"I agree" (Sgd.) "Marc Nadon"
J.A.
"I agree" (Sgd.) "B. Malone"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-137-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: Moez Kassam v. Her Majesty the Queen et al
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, B.C.
DATE OF HEARING: October 4, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: DÉCARY, NADON, MALONE JJ.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Moez Kassam FOR THE APPLICANT
(pro-se)
Ms. Maria Molloy FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General for Canada

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases