Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2009

Meziani v. Canada (Attorney General)

2009 FCA 3
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Meziani v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-01-13 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 3 File numbers A-192-08 Decision Content Date: 20090113 Docket: A-192-08 Citation: 2009 FCA 3 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BLAIS J.A. BETWEEN: MUSTAPHA MEZIANI Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A. Date: 20090113 Docket: A-192-08 Citation: 2009 FCA 3 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BLAIS J.A. BETWEEN: MUSTAPHA MEZIANI Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009.) DÉCARY J.A. [1] The applicant cited the discovery of new facts to ask an umpire to reconsider a decision relating to him (section 120 of the Employment Insurance Act). [2] The Umpire concluded that the alleged facts were not new. There is no reviewable error of fact or law in that conclusion. [3] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs. “Robert Décary” J.A. Certified true translation Johanna Kratz FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-192-08 (APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF UMPIRE MAURICE E. LAGACÉ DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2007, FILE NO. CUB 65978C) STYLE OF CAUSE: MUSTAPHA MEZIANI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal,…

Read full judgment
Meziani v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2009-01-13
Neutral citation
2009 FCA 3
File numbers
A-192-08
Decision Content
Date: 20090113
Docket: A-192-08
Citation: 2009 FCA 3
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BLAIS J.A.
BETWEEN:
MUSTAPHA MEZIANI
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
Date: 20090113
Docket: A-192-08
Citation: 2009 FCA 3
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BLAIS J.A.
BETWEEN:
MUSTAPHA MEZIANI
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 13, 2009.)
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] The applicant cited the discovery of new facts to ask an umpire to reconsider a decision relating to him (section 120 of the Employment Insurance Act).
[2] The Umpire concluded that the alleged facts were not new. There is no reviewable error of fact or law in that conclusion.
[3] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs.
“Robert Décary”
J.A.
Certified true translation
Johanna Kratz
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-192-08
(APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE DECISION OF UMPIRE MAURICE E. LAGACÉ DATED NOVEMBER 21, 2007, FILE NO. CUB 65978C)
STYLE OF CAUSE: MUSTAPHA MEZIANI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: January 13, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BLAIS J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DÉCARY J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mustapha Meziani
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE APPLICANT
(for himself)
Pauline Leroux
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases