Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Chaya v. Canada

2004 FCA 327
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Chaya v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-10-04 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 327 File numbers A-9-03 Decision Content Date: 20041004 Docket: A-9-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 327 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. BETWEEN: AREF CHAYA Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on September 30, 2004. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 4, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. Date: 20041004 Docket: A-9-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 327 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. BETWEEN: AREF CHAYA Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] The applicant applies for judicial review of a decision of the Tax Court which denied him a "wholly dependent person" credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. [2] The applicant says that he supported his daughter abroad in the year 2000. However, to be entitled to a credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii), the applicant, at any time in the year, must have maintained a self contained domestic establishment in which he lived and actually supported his daughter in that establishment. [3] The applicant concedes that he did not at any time in the year 2000 live in a domestic establishment with his daughter. He therefore does not qualify for the credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii). [4] The applicant says that the law is unfair and he asks …

Read full judgment
Chaya v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-10-04
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 327
File numbers
A-9-03
Decision Content
Date: 20041004
Docket: A-9-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 327
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
BETWEEN:
AREF CHAYA
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on September 30, 2004.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 4, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
Date: 20041004
Docket: A-9-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 327
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
BETWEEN:
AREF CHAYA
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] The applicant applies for judicial review of a decision of the Tax Court which denied him a "wholly dependent person" credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
[2] The applicant says that he supported his daughter abroad in the year 2000. However, to be entitled to a credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii), the applicant, at any time in the year, must have maintained a self contained domestic establishment in which he lived and actually supported his daughter in that establishment.
[3] The applicant concedes that he did not at any time in the year 2000 live in a domestic establishment with his daughter. He therefore does not qualify for the credit under subparagraph 118(1)(b)(ii).
[4] The applicant says that the law is unfair and he asks the Court to make an exception for him. However the Court does not have that power. The Court must take the statute as it finds it. It is not open to the Court to make exceptions to statutory provisions on the grounds of fairness or equity. If the applicant considers the law unfair, his remedy is with Parliament, not with the Court.
[5] The application should be dismissed.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
"I agree
J. Richard C.J."
"I agree
Gilles Létourneau J.A."
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-9-03
(APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED
DECEMBER 10, 2002, DOCKET NO. 2002-3095(IT)1)
STYLE OF CAUSE: Aref Chaya v. Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF HEARING: Winnipeg, Manitoba
DATE OF HEARING: September 30, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Rothstein J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: Chief Justice Richard
Létourneau J.A.
DATED: October 4, 2004
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Aref Chaya ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Mr. Michael Van Dam FOR THE RESPONDENT
Department of Justice
Winnipeg, Manitoba
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Aref Chaya ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Mr. Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases