Correa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Correa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-04-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 289 File numbers IMM-1968-00 Decision Content Date: 20010403 Docket: IMM-1968-00 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 289 BETWEEN: ALEJANDRO LUNA CORREA ROBERTO VARGAS ESCUTIA Applicants - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER TREMBLAY-LAMER J.: [1] In spite of the argument of counsel for the applicant, I find that the Board clearly and unequivocally determined the applicants not to be credible, and, in the course of so doing, offered detailed reasons for its decision citing implausibilities and inconsistencies in the applicants' evidence which concerned central aspects of their claim. I am satisfied that the credibility findings were based upon the evidence and that the inferences that the panel drew were reasonable. Concerning Ms. Hernandez's testimony, I do not accept the argument that the Board ignored the evidence. Given that the witness's knowledge of the central elements of the applicants' claim was based solely on what they told her, I am satisfied that it was not unreasonable for the Board to acknowledge her testimony but not to give it any weight. [2] In light of the lack of credibility of the applicants, I do not need to address the question of state protection. [3] The application for judicial review is dismissed. "Danièle Tremblay-Lamer" JUDGE OTTAWA, ONTARIO April 3, 2001. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Correa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-04-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 289 File numbers IMM-1968-00 Decision Content Date: 20010403 Docket: IMM-1968-00 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 289 BETWEEN: ALEJANDRO LUNA CORREA ROBERTO VARGAS ESCUTIA Applicants - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER TREMBLAY-LAMER J.: [1] In spite of the argument of counsel for the applicant, I find that the Board clearly and unequivocally determined the applicants not to be credible, and, in the course of so doing, offered detailed reasons for its decision citing implausibilities and inconsistencies in the applicants' evidence which concerned central aspects of their claim. I am satisfied that the credibility findings were based upon the evidence and that the inferences that the panel drew were reasonable. Concerning Ms. Hernandez's testimony, I do not accept the argument that the Board ignored the evidence. Given that the witness's knowledge of the central elements of the applicants' claim was based solely on what they told her, I am satisfied that it was not unreasonable for the Board to acknowledge her testimony but not to give it any weight. [2] In light of the lack of credibility of the applicants, I do not need to address the question of state protection. [3] The application for judicial review is dismissed. "Danièle Tremblay-Lamer" JUDGE OTTAWA, ONTARIO April 3, 2001.
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80