R. v. Cole
Court headnote
R. v. Cole Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-05-01 Report [1991] 1 SCR 904 Case number 21542 Judges L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Stevenson, William On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 21542 Decision Content R. v. Cole, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 904 Ronald Robert Cole Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Cole File No.: 21542. 1991: May 1. Present: L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Stevenson JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Allegation that trial judge not impartial ‑‑ Trial judge asking questions of appellant ‑‑ A properly instructed jury acting judicially could have convicted ‑‑ Section 686(1) (a)(i) properly applied by Court of Appeal ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 686(1) (a)(i). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 686(1) (a)(i). APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissing an appeal from conviction by Selbie Co. Ct. J. Appeal dismissed. Barry L. Long, for the appellant. Elizabeth Bennett, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by L'Heureux‑Dubé J. ‑‑ This case comes to us as of right on a dissent on a point of law in the Court of Appeal. Given the function of a Court of Appeal under s. 686(1) (a)(i), Criminal Code , we are all of the view that the majority of the Court of Appeal…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Cole Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-05-01 Report [1991] 1 SCR 904 Case number 21542 Judges L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Stevenson, William On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 21542 Decision Content R. v. Cole, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 904 Ronald Robert Cole Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Cole File No.: 21542. 1991: May 1. Present: L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Stevenson JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Allegation that trial judge not impartial ‑‑ Trial judge asking questions of appellant ‑‑ A properly instructed jury acting judicially could have convicted ‑‑ Section 686(1) (a)(i) properly applied by Court of Appeal ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 686(1) (a)(i). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 686(1) (a)(i). APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissing an appeal from conviction by Selbie Co. Ct. J. Appeal dismissed. Barry L. Long, for the appellant. Elizabeth Bennett, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by L'Heureux‑Dubé J. ‑‑ This case comes to us as of right on a dissent on a point of law in the Court of Appeal. Given the function of a Court of Appeal under s. 686(1) (a)(i), Criminal Code , we are all of the view that the majority of the Court of Appeal made no error and, reviewing the whole of the evidence anew, that the evidence is one upon which a properly instructed jury, acting judicially, could reasonably have entered a conviction. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Bellamy & Long, Vancouver. Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Vancouver.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506