R. v. Briglio
Court headnote
R. v. Briglio Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1987-10-21 Report [1987] 2 SCR 465 Case number 17957 Judges Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 17957 Decision Content R. v. Briglio, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 465 Mario Briglio Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent indexed as: r. v. briglio File No.: 17957. 1987: October 21. Present: Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Dangerous driving ‑‑ Whether the Court of Appeal erred in rejecting a finding at trial that the accused drove as he did "probably out of necessity". APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered October 6, 1983, setting aside an acquittal on a charge of dangerous driving and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. W. G. Burke‑Robertson, Q.C., for the appellant. Jeff Casey, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. Beetz J.‑‑We are all of the view that the Court of Appeal did not err in setting aside the acquittal and ordering a new trial. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Kozak & Delorenzi, Sault Ste‑Marie. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for the Province of Ontario, Toronto. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Briglio Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1987-10-21 Report [1987] 2 SCR 465 Case number 17957 Judges Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 17957 Decision Content R. v. Briglio, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 465 Mario Briglio Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent indexed as: r. v. briglio File No.: 17957. 1987: October 21. Present: Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Dangerous driving ‑‑ Whether the Court of Appeal erred in rejecting a finding at trial that the accused drove as he did "probably out of necessity". APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered October 6, 1983, setting aside an acquittal on a charge of dangerous driving and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. W. G. Burke‑Robertson, Q.C., for the appellant. Jeff Casey, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. Beetz J.‑‑We are all of the view that the Court of Appeal did not err in setting aside the acquittal and ordering a new trial. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Kozak & Delorenzi, Sault Ste‑Marie. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for the Province of Ontario, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506