R. v. Austin
Court headnote
R. v. Austin Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1996-01-31 Report [1996] 1 SCR 72 Case number 24486 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 24486 Decision Content R. v. Austin, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 72 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Norman Rolland Austin Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Austin File No.: 24486. 1996: January 31. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Sentencing ‑‑ Firearms ‑‑ Mandatory prohibition order ‑‑ Trial judge's imposition of ten‑year firearms prohibition restored. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1994), 94 C.C.C. (3d) 252, 36 C.R. (4th) 241, 50 B.C.A.C. 241, 82 W.A.C. 241, allowing the accused's appeal from the sentence imposed by Trueman Prov. Ct. J. Appeal allowed. Wendy Rubin, for the appellant. Christine Birnie, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 Lamer C.J. ‑‑ We are all of the view, for the reasons of Chief Justice McEachern, to allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Court of Appeal and restore the trial judge's order. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Wendy Rubin, Vancouver. Solicitor for…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Austin Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1996-01-31 Report [1996] 1 SCR 72 Case number 24486 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 24486 Decision Content R. v. Austin, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 72 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Norman Rolland Austin Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Austin File No.: 24486. 1996: January 31. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Sentencing ‑‑ Firearms ‑‑ Mandatory prohibition order ‑‑ Trial judge's imposition of ten‑year firearms prohibition restored. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1994), 94 C.C.C. (3d) 252, 36 C.R. (4th) 241, 50 B.C.A.C. 241, 82 W.A.C. 241, allowing the accused's appeal from the sentence imposed by Trueman Prov. Ct. J. Appeal allowed. Wendy Rubin, for the appellant. Christine Birnie, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 Lamer C.J. ‑‑ We are all of the view, for the reasons of Chief Justice McEachern, to allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Court of Appeal and restore the trial judge's order. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Wendy Rubin, Vancouver. Solicitor for the respondent: Christine Birnie, Telkwa, B.C.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506