Cantieri v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Cantieri v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-10-25 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1267 File numbers T-1974-04 Decision Content Date: 20061025 Docket: T-1974-04 Citation: 2006 FC 1267 Between: JORGE LUIS CANTIERI Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the bill of costs due to the respondent following a judgment dated June 7, 2005, dismissing the applicant’s application for judicial review with costs. The assessment was made on the basis of the parties’ written submissions. [2] In light of the latter, the respondent’s fees are set at $1,636 for the services rendered under items 2 (6 units), 13 (4 units), 14 (2 units/hour x 19 min.) and 26 (3 units). I adjusted the number of units claimed on the basis that the file was not complex for a lawyer specialized in correctional law. It should be noted that the latter withdrew his claims concerning items 25 and 27 of Tariff B. [3] Disbursements in the amount of $667.16 are allowed as claimed. In response to the applicant’s comments concerning photocopying costs, the practice of assessment officers is to grant a lump sum of $0.25 per page for copies deemed necessary for a case. [4] The respondent’s bill of costs is therefore assessed in the amount of $2,303.16. A certificate is issued for this amount. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 25th DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFIC…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Cantieri v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-10-25 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1267 File numbers T-1974-04 Decision Content Date: 20061025 Docket: T-1974-04 Citation: 2006 FC 1267 Between: JORGE LUIS CANTIERI Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of the bill of costs due to the respondent following a judgment dated June 7, 2005, dismissing the applicant’s application for judicial review with costs. The assessment was made on the basis of the parties’ written submissions. [2] In light of the latter, the respondent’s fees are set at $1,636 for the services rendered under items 2 (6 units), 13 (4 units), 14 (2 units/hour x 19 min.) and 26 (3 units). I adjusted the number of units claimed on the basis that the file was not complex for a lawyer specialized in correctional law. It should be noted that the latter withdrew his claims concerning items 25 and 27 of Tariff B. [3] Disbursements in the amount of $667.16 are allowed as claimed. In response to the applicant’s comments concerning photocopying costs, the practice of assessment officers is to grant a lump sum of $0.25 per page for copies deemed necessary for a case. [4] The respondent’s bill of costs is therefore assessed in the amount of $2,303.16. A certificate is issued for this amount. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 25th DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Susan Deichert, LLB FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1974-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: JORGE LUIS CANTIERI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY: Michelle Lamy, Assessment Officer DATED: October 25, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Sylvie Bordelais Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80