Shahbaz Baig v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Shahbaz Baig v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-04-17 Neutral citation 2007 FC 405 File numbers IMM-3227-06 Decision Content Date: 20070417 Docket: IMM-3227-06 Citation: 2007 FC 405 Toronto, Ontario, April 17, 2007 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes BETWEEN: MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ BAIG Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The Applicant is an adult made, a citizen of Pakistan, who claims refugee protection in Canada based on his alleged homosexual orientation. That claim was rejected in a decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board dated May 17, 2007. The Applicant seeks judicial review of that decision and that it be referred to for re-determination by another member of the Board. [2] A review of the evidence as to the Applicant’s alleged homosexual orientation was conducted by the Board which in giving Reasons, stated that the Applicant’s evidence was not credible or trustworthy. The Board noted correctly, that the evidence adduced did not support or corroborate the allegation that the Applicant was a homosexual. [3] The question before this Court is simply as to whether the Board’s assessment as to the Applicant’s credibility should be set aside on judicial review. The criteria for doing so is whether the assessment was patently unreasonable (Aguebor v. Canada, (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1993], 160 N.R. 315 at 316 (F.C.A.)). [4] Here …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Shahbaz Baig v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2007-04-17 Neutral citation 2007 FC 405 File numbers IMM-3227-06 Decision Content Date: 20070417 Docket: IMM-3227-06 Citation: 2007 FC 405 Toronto, Ontario, April 17, 2007 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes BETWEEN: MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ BAIG Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] The Applicant is an adult made, a citizen of Pakistan, who claims refugee protection in Canada based on his alleged homosexual orientation. That claim was rejected in a decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board dated May 17, 2007. The Applicant seeks judicial review of that decision and that it be referred to for re-determination by another member of the Board. [2] A review of the evidence as to the Applicant’s alleged homosexual orientation was conducted by the Board which in giving Reasons, stated that the Applicant’s evidence was not credible or trustworthy. The Board noted correctly, that the evidence adduced did not support or corroborate the allegation that the Applicant was a homosexual. [3] The question before this Court is simply as to whether the Board’s assessment as to the Applicant’s credibility should be set aside on judicial review. The criteria for doing so is whether the assessment was patently unreasonable (Aguebor v. Canada, (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1993], 160 N.R. 315 at 316 (F.C.A.)). [4] Here the only evidence before the Board as to the Applicant’s alleged sexual orientation was that of the Applicant himself, no corroborating evidence of any kind was offered. Counsel was not able to point out, no was the Court able to determine, any proper basis upon which the Board’s findings could be said to be patently unreasonable. [5] The Application will be dismissed without costs. There is no question for certification. ORDER For the reasons provided, THIS COURT ORDERS that: The Application is dismissed. There is no question for certification. No Order to costs. “Roger T. Hughes” Judge FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3227-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ BAIG v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 16, 2007 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: HUGHES J. DATED: April 17, 2007 APPEARANCES: John Savaglio FOR THE APPLICANT Catherine Vasilaros FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John Savaglio Barrister & Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT Pickering, Ontario John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT Toronto, Ontario
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80