Chopra v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Chopra v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2015-09-22 Neutral citation 2015 FCA 205 File numbers A-204-14, A-205-14 Decision Content Date: 20150922 Dockets: A-204-14 A-205-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 205 CORAM: NADON J.A. WEBB J.A. BOIVIN J.A. Docket: A-204-14 BETWEEN: SHIV CHOPRA Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-205-14 AND BETWEEN: MARGARET HAYDON Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20150922 Dockets: A-204-14 A-205-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 205 CORAM: NADON J.A. WEBB J.A. BOIVIN J.A. Docket: A-204-14 BETWEEN: SHIV CHOPRA Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-205-14 AND BETWEEN: MARGARET HAYDON Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015). NADON J.A. [1] In appeals A-204-14 and A-205-14, the appellants challenge that part of Mactavish J.’s decision of March 25, 2014 (2014 FC 246) wherein she dismissed their applications for judicial review as they pertained to the adjudicator’s finding of insubordination. [2] We are all agreed that in so concluding, the Judge made no error which would justify intervention on our part. [3] The appeals will therefore be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon…
Read full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Chopra v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2015-09-22 Neutral citation 2015 FCA 205 File numbers A-204-14, A-205-14 Decision Content Date: 20150922 Dockets: A-204-14 A-205-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 205 CORAM: NADON J.A. WEBB J.A. BOIVIN J.A. Docket: A-204-14 BETWEEN: SHIV CHOPRA Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-205-14 AND BETWEEN: MARGARET HAYDON Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20150922 Dockets: A-204-14 A-205-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 205 CORAM: NADON J.A. WEBB J.A. BOIVIN J.A. Docket: A-204-14 BETWEEN: SHIV CHOPRA Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-205-14 AND BETWEEN: MARGARET HAYDON Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 22, 2015). NADON J.A. [1] In appeals A-204-14 and A-205-14, the appellants challenge that part of Mactavish J.’s decision of March 25, 2014 (2014 FC 246) wherein she dismissed their applications for judicial review as they pertained to the adjudicator’s finding of insubordination. [2] We are all agreed that in so concluding, the Judge made no error which would justify intervention on our part. [3] The appeals will therefore be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD Dockets: A-204-14 and A-205-14 DOCKET: A-204-14 STYLE OF CAUSE: SHIV CHOPRA v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND DOCKET: A-205-14 STYLE OF CAUSE: MARGARET HAYDON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: September 22, 2015 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. WEBB J.A. BOIVIN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: James Cameron Michael Fisher For The Appellants Caroline Engmann For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne & Yazbeck LLP/s.r.l. Ottawa, Ontario For The Appellants William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca