Kenny v. Canada (Attorney General)

Kenny v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-11-08
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 370
File numbers
A-75-05
Decision Content
Date: 20051108
Docket: A-75-05
Citation: 2005 FCA 370
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
CARL KENNY
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on November 8, 2005.
Judgment delivered at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on November 8, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20051108
Docket: A-75-05
Citation: 2005 FCA 370
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
CARL KENNY
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on November 8, 2005)
NADON J.A.
[1] This is an appeal from the decision of Mr. Justice Phelan of the Federal Court dated January 20, 2005 (2005 FC 87) which dismissed the Appellant's judicial review application of the Minister's decision to deduct the sum of $50,314.01 from his CPP benefits of $54,414.39 and to remit the sum deducted to the Province of New Brunswick.
[2] We are all agreed that this appeal should be dismissed. We are substantially in agreement with the reasons given by Mr. Justice Phelan in dismissing the Appellant's judicial review proceedings and would only add that it is implicit in the order and reasons of Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson dated March 25, 2004, that she was setting aside the Minister's first determination so as to ensure compliance with the Statute and Regulations. At paragraphs 23 and 24 of her reasons, Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson wrote:
[23] (...) Subsection 65(2) of the CPP provides that the Minister may, in accordance with any terms and conditions that may be prescribed, deduct and pay. Thus, before the Minister could consider whether to exercise discretion, the Minister had to ensure compliance with respect to the prescribed conditions set out in section 76 of the regulations. Since there is nothing before me establishing or indicating compliance with the above-referenced legislated condition, the ministerial delegate's decision of January 24, 2003 must be quashed as requested.
[24] The application for judicial review will therefore be allowed with costs to the applicant and the matter will be remitted to the Minister for redetermination in accordance with the statute and regulations. An order will so provide.
[3] We are therefore of the opinion that the Minister's redetermination, whereby he assured himself that the four conditions prescribed by subsection 76(4) of the Regulations for the deduction and the payment to the Province of New Brunswick had been met, is in full compliance with the order made by Madam Justice Layden-Stevenson.
[4] As a result, the appeal will be dismissed but, in the circumstances, without costs.
"Marc Nadon"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-75-05
APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED JANUARY 20, 2005, DOCKET NO. T-1107-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: CARL KENNY and A.G.C.
PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING: November 8, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: RICHARD C.J.
DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
John L. McAllister
FOR THE APPELLANT
Stephan Bertrand
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John L. McAllister
Miramichi, New Brunswick
FOR THE APPELLANT
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT