R. v. Bachman
Court headnote
R. v. Bachman Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-06-14 Report [1988] 1 SCR 1094 Case number 20405, 20424 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 20405, 20424 Decision Content r. v. bachman, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1094 Wodek Martin Bachman and Benjamin Lloyd Taarnes Appellants v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent indexed as: r. v. bachman File Nos.: 20405, 20424. 1988: June 14. Present: Dickson C.J. and McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law‑‑Narcotics‑‑Trafficking in a narcotic‑‑Admissibility of certificate of analysis‑‑Notice of intended use of certificate‑‑Whether notice reasonable‑‑Appeals as of right. APPEALS from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal, summarized (1987), 52 Alta. L.R. (2d) 411, allowing the Crown's appeals from the acquittals of appellants on charges of trafficking in cocaine, and ordering a new trial. Appeals dismissed. Richard Cairns, for the appellants. Ron Fainstein, Q.C., and Shelagh R. Creagh, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑We will not need to call upon you Mr. Fainstein and Ms. Creagh. These appeals are as of right. We are not persuaded that the Court of Appeal of Alberta erred in directing a new trial for the appellants. 2. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. Judg…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Bachman Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-06-14 Report [1988] 1 SCR 1094 Case number 20405, 20424 Judges Dickson, Robert George Brian; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 20405, 20424 Decision Content r. v. bachman, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1094 Wodek Martin Bachman and Benjamin Lloyd Taarnes Appellants v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent indexed as: r. v. bachman File Nos.: 20405, 20424. 1988: June 14. Present: Dickson C.J. and McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law‑‑Narcotics‑‑Trafficking in a narcotic‑‑Admissibility of certificate of analysis‑‑Notice of intended use of certificate‑‑Whether notice reasonable‑‑Appeals as of right. APPEALS from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal, summarized (1987), 52 Alta. L.R. (2d) 411, allowing the Crown's appeals from the acquittals of appellants on charges of trafficking in cocaine, and ordering a new trial. Appeals dismissed. Richard Cairns, for the appellants. Ron Fainstein, Q.C., and Shelagh R. Creagh, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1. The Chief Justice‑‑We will not need to call upon you Mr. Fainstein and Ms. Creagh. These appeals are as of right. We are not persuaded that the Court of Appeal of Alberta erred in directing a new trial for the appellants. 2. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellants: Starr, Cairns, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: Frank Iacobucci, Ottawa.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506