R. v. M.O.
Court headnote
R. v. M.O. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2000-10-13 Neutral citation 2000 SCC 49 Report [2000] 2 SCR 594 Case number 27555 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 27555 Decision Content R. v. M.O., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 594 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. M.O. Respondent Indexed as: R. v. M.O. Neutral citation: 2000 SCC 49. File No.: 27555. 2000: October 13. Present: McLachlin C.J. and L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law – Sexual assault – Consent – Mistaken belief in consent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1999), 124 O.A.C. 201, 138 C.C.C. (3d) 476, 29 C.R. (5th) 34, [1999] O.J. No. 3526 (QL), dismissing the Crown’s appeal from the accused’s acquittal on charges of sexual assault. Appeal allowed. Robert Kelly, for the appellant. Christopher A. W. Bentley, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 The Chief Justice — We would all allow the appeal and order a new trial substantially for the reasons of Mr. Justice Rosenberg. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Bentley & Associates, London, Ontario. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. M.O. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2000-10-13 Neutral citation 2000 SCC 49 Report [2000] 2 SCR 594 Case number 27555 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 27555 Decision Content R. v. M.O., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 594 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. M.O. Respondent Indexed as: R. v. M.O. Neutral citation: 2000 SCC 49. File No.: 27555. 2000: October 13. Present: McLachlin C.J. and L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law – Sexual assault – Consent – Mistaken belief in consent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1999), 124 O.A.C. 201, 138 C.C.C. (3d) 476, 29 C.R. (5th) 34, [1999] O.J. No. 3526 (QL), dismissing the Crown’s appeal from the accused’s acquittal on charges of sexual assault. Appeal allowed. Robert Kelly, for the appellant. Christopher A. W. Bentley, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 The Chief Justice — We would all allow the appeal and order a new trial substantially for the reasons of Mr. Justice Rosenberg. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto. Solicitors for the respondent: Bentley & Associates, London, Ontario.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506