Canada (Attorney General) v. Myers
Source text
Canada (Attorney General) v. Myers Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-09 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 57 File numbers A-298-05 Decision Content Date: 20060209 Docket: A-298-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 57 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and DOREEN MYERS Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20060209 Docket: A-298-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 57 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and DOREEN MYERS Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the Attorney General, we are not persuaded that the record discloses any conclusion by the Umpire that was not reasonably open to him on the evidence. [2] This application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs that are fixed at $400.00 in total. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-298-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA APPLICANT and DOREEN MYERS RESPONDENT PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: FEBRUARY 9, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN, SHARLOW & MALONE J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 20…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Myers Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-09 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 57 File numbers A-298-05 Decision Content Date: 20060209 Docket: A-298-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 57 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and DOREEN MYERS Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20060209 Docket: A-298-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 57 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and DOREEN MYERS Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2006) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the Attorney General, we are not persuaded that the record discloses any conclusion by the Umpire that was not reasonably open to him on the evidence. [2] This application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs that are fixed at $400.00 in total. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-298-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA APPLICANT and DOREEN MYERS RESPONDENT PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: FEBRUARY 9, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN, SHARLOW & MALONE J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2006 APPEARANCES: Derek Edwards FOR THE APPLICANT Doreen Myers FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE APPLICANT Doreen Myers Stratford, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80