Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2004

Wang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2004 FC 668
ImmigrationJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Wang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-05-06 Neutral citation 2004 FC 668 File numbers IMM-315-03 Decision Content Date: 20040506 Docket: IMM-315-03 Citation: 2004 FC 668 Toronto, Ontario, May 6th, 2004 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell BETWEEN: LIANG WANG Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] In the present case, the Applicant applied for a student visa to study in Canada. On the face of the record before the Visa Officer, I am satisfied that there is no obvious reason to doubt the Applicant's bona fides. However, I think it is fair to say that, in refusing the application, the Visa Officer held an unarticulated suspicion about the Applicant's intentions. [2] It is agreed that the standard of review is reasonableness. I find it is unfair and unreasonable to reject the Applicant's application without giving a cogent reason. The reason provided by the Visa Officer is that the Applicant's study plan is vague. [3] Each case turns on its own merits. In this case I find there is no cogent reason for the rejection and, as a result, I find the decision is unreasonable. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that Accordingly, I set aside the Visa Officer's decision and refer this matter to a different visa officer for re-determination. "Douglas R. Campbell" J.F.C. FEDERAL COURT Name of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: IMM-315-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: LIA…

Read full judgment
Wang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2004-05-06
Neutral citation
2004 FC 668
File numbers
IMM-315-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040506
Docket: IMM-315-03
Citation: 2004 FC 668
Toronto, Ontario, May 6th, 2004
Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell
BETWEEN:
LIANG WANG
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
[1] In the present case, the Applicant applied for a student visa to study in Canada. On the face of the record before the Visa Officer, I am satisfied that there is no obvious reason to doubt the Applicant's bona fides. However, I think it is fair to say that, in refusing the application, the Visa Officer held an unarticulated suspicion about the Applicant's intentions.
[2] It is agreed that the standard of review is reasonableness. I find it is unfair and unreasonable to reject the Applicant's application without giving a cogent reason. The reason provided by the Visa Officer is that the Applicant's study plan is vague.
[3] Each case turns on its own merits. In this case I find there is no cogent reason for the rejection and, as a result, I find the decision is unreasonable.
ORDER
THIS COURT ORDERS that
Accordingly, I set aside the Visa Officer's decision and refer this matter to a different visa officer for re-determination.
"Douglas R. Campbell"
J.F.C.
FEDERAL COURT
Name of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
DOCKET: IMM-315-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: LIANG WANG
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION
Respondent
DATE OF HEARING: MAY 6, 2004
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER BY: CAMPBELL J.
DATED: MAY 6, 2004
APPEARANCES BY:
Mr. Cecil L. Rotenberg, Q.C.
FOR THE APPLICANT
Mr. Jamie R. D. Todd
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Cecil L. Rotenberg, Q.C.
Barristers & Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANT
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT
FEDERAL COURT
Date: 20040506
Docket: IMM-315-03
BETWEEN:
LIANG WANG
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases