Ermineskin v. Canada

Ermineskin v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2002-08-19
Neutral citation
2002 FCT 890
File numbers
T-1254-92
Decision Content
Date: 20020819
Docket: T-1254-92
Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 890
CALGARY, Alberta, Monday, the 19, day of August, 2002.
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TEITELBAUM
BETWEEN:
CHIEF ERMINESKIN, LAWRENCE WILDCAT, GORDON LEE, ART LITTLECHILD, MAURICE WOLFE, CURTIS ERMINESKIN, GERRY ERMINESKIN, EARL ERMINESKIN, RICK WOLFE, KEN CUTARM, BRIAN LEE, LESTER FRAYNN, the elected Chief and Councillors of the Ermineskin Indian Band and Nations suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all the other members of the Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation
Plaintiffs
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND THE MINISTER OF FINANCE
Defendants
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
[1] The plaintiffs Chief John Ermineskin et al. have filed into the Office of the Registry of the Federal Court a motion for an Order pursuant to Rules 237(3) or 238 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 permitting the Ermineskin plaintiffs to examine for discovery as deponent for the Crown or otherwise, Mr. E. A. Moore. The grounds for the said motion can be found in the Notice of Motion.
[2] On two previous occasions, namely September 21, 1995 and August 20, 1997, Mr. Justice MacKay refused a similar request by the present plaintiffs to have Mr. E. A. Moore examined as a Crown deponent, pursuant to Rule 237(3).
[3] This is the third attempt by the plaintiffs to achieve what was twice before refused.
[4] For the same reasons given by the Honourable Justice MacKay, on the above mentioned dates, the application to order Mr. E. A. Moore to be examined for discovery as a deponent for the Crown is denied.
[5] The plaintiffs request, in the alternative, that they be allowed to examine Mr. E. A. Moore as a non-party, pursuant to Rule 238. I am not satisfied that the plaintiffs have been unable to obtain the information either informally from Mr. E. A. Moore, or from the Crown's deponent, Mr. Eickmeier. The plaintiffs have not established that the Crown's deponent ought to be supplemented by Mr. E. A. Moore.
[6] Accordingly, the Ermineskin plaintiffs' application to have Mr. E. A. Moore examined as a non-party, pursuant to Rule 238, is denied.
ORDER
THIS COURT ORDERS that the application to order Mr. E. A. Moore to be examined for discovery either as a deponent for the Crown pursuant to Rule 237(3), or as a non-party pursuant to Rule 238, is denied with costs.
"Max M. Teitelbaum"
J. F. C. C.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKETS: T-2022-89 and T-1254-92
STYLE OF CAUSE: Chief Victor Buffalo et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen et al.
Chief John Ermineskin et al. v. Her Majesty the
Queen et al.
PLACE OF HEARING: CALGARY, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING: July 16, 2002
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER : TEITELBAUM, J.
DATED: August 19, 2002
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Ed Molstad, Q.C. FOR PLAINTIFF SAMSON
T-2022-89
Ms. Maria Morellato FOR PLAINTIFF
ERMINESKIN
T-1254-92
Mr. Allan Macleod, Q.C.
Mr. Clarke Hunter FOR HER MAJESTY THE
Mr. Ray Chartier QUEEN
Mr. S. H. (Stan) Rutwind FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR ALBERTA
- 2 -
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Parlee McLaws FOR PLAINTIFF SAMSON
Edmonton, Alberta T-2022-89
Blake, Cassels & Graydon FOR PLAINTIFF
Vancouver, British Columbia ERMINESKIN
T-1254-92
Macleod Dixon LLP FOR HER MAJESTY THE
Calgary, Alberta QUEEN
Alberta Justice Constitutional FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
& Aboriginal Law FOR ALBERTA
Edmonton, Alberta