Kulasehanampillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Kulasehanampillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-06-08 Neutral citation 2006 FC 710 File numbers IMM-6112-05 Decision Content Date: 20060608 Docket: IMM-6112-05 Citation: 2006 FC 710 OTTAWA, Ontario, June 8, 2006 PRESENT: The Honourable Paul U.C. Rouleau BETWEEN: SIVASEELAN KULASEHANAMPILLAI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] After a careful reading of the transcript of the proceeding before the Tribunal, I was satisfied not to proceed with submissions, having convinced myself that the manner in which the hearing was conducted was obviously confusing not only to the applicant but to this reader as well. I advised counsel of my finding. There were no objections to my disposition of this matter forthwith. JUDGMENT The application for judicial review is allowed. The matter is hereby returned for a rehearing before a differently constituted panel. "Paul U.C. Rouleau" Deputy Judge FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-6112-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: Sivaseelan Kulasehanampillai v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: May 31, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: ROULEAU D.J. DATED: June 8, 2006 APPEARANCES: Lorne Waldman Barrister and Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT Ian Hicks FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Lorne Waldman Barrister and Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Kulasehanampillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-06-08 Neutral citation 2006 FC 710 File numbers IMM-6112-05 Decision Content Date: 20060608 Docket: IMM-6112-05 Citation: 2006 FC 710 OTTAWA, Ontario, June 8, 2006 PRESENT: The Honourable Paul U.C. Rouleau BETWEEN: SIVASEELAN KULASEHANAMPILLAI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] After a careful reading of the transcript of the proceeding before the Tribunal, I was satisfied not to proceed with submissions, having convinced myself that the manner in which the hearing was conducted was obviously confusing not only to the applicant but to this reader as well. I advised counsel of my finding. There were no objections to my disposition of this matter forthwith. JUDGMENT The application for judicial review is allowed. The matter is hereby returned for a rehearing before a differently constituted panel. "Paul U.C. Rouleau" Deputy Judge FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-6112-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: Sivaseelan Kulasehanampillai v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: May 31, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: ROULEAU D.J. DATED: June 8, 2006 APPEARANCES: Lorne Waldman Barrister and Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT Ian Hicks FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Lorne Waldman Barrister and Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80