Hayden v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Hayden v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-07-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 229 File numbers A-135-99 Decision Content Date: 20010703 Docket: A-135-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 229 BETWEEN: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS R. BEZUHLY ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On June 30, 2000, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the application for judicial review of a decision of the Umpire and awarded costs. The Respondent filed a bill of costs and requested an assessment in writing without personal appearance. Directions were issued to both parties setting a timetable for serving and filing of materials, including written submissions. The Applicant, who represented himself throughout, did not file any submissions in response. [2] In absence of a response from the Applicant, I examined the items claimed in the bill of costs to ensure that they were within the parameters of the Federal Court Rules and Tariff B. I am satisfied that the supporting materials justify the Respondent's Bill of Costs and I allow it as presented at $935.19. "Rita Bezuhly" R. Bezuhly Assessment Officer Toronto, Ontario July 3, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-135-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES ON MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2001 AS…
Read full judgment
Hayden v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-07-03 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 229 File numbers A-135-99 Decision Content Date: 20010703 Docket: A-135-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 229 BETWEEN: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS R. BEZUHLY ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On June 30, 2000, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the application for judicial review of a decision of the Umpire and awarded costs. The Respondent filed a bill of costs and requested an assessment in writing without personal appearance. Directions were issued to both parties setting a timetable for serving and filing of materials, including written submissions. The Applicant, who represented himself throughout, did not file any submissions in response. [2] In absence of a response from the Applicant, I examined the items claimed in the bill of costs to ensure that they were within the parameters of the Federal Court Rules and Tariff B. I am satisfied that the supporting materials justify the Respondent's Bill of Costs and I allow it as presented at $935.19. "Rita Bezuhly" R. Bezuhly Assessment Officer Toronto, Ontario July 3, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-135-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES ON MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2001 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS BY: RITA BEZUHLY DATED: TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2001 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Respondent FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20010703 Docket: A-135-99 BETWEEN: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant -and- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca