Archambault v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency)
Source text
Archambault v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 63 File numbers A-71-05 Decision Content Date: 20060210 Docket: A-71-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 63 CORAM: RICHARD C.J.A. NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PIERRE ARCHAMBAULT Appellant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on February 8, 2006. Judgement delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 10, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. Date: 20060210 Docket: A-71-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 63 CORAM: RICHARD C.J.A. NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PIERRE ARCHAMBAULT Appellant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT RICHARD C.J.A.: [1] This is an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court rendered on February 7, 2005 [2005 FC 183], dismissing with costs the application for judicial review filed by the appellant Pierre Archambault against a decision rendered on March 24, 2003 by Léo-Paul Guindon, a designated adjudicator, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction under section 92 of the Public Service Staff Relations Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-35. [2] The appellant seeks to have the Federal Court decision, including the order as to costs, quashed and to have the case returned to an adjudicator of the Public Service Labour Relations Board. [3] We do not see any error in t…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Archambault v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-10 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 63 File numbers A-71-05 Decision Content Date: 20060210 Docket: A-71-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 63 CORAM: RICHARD C.J.A. NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PIERRE ARCHAMBAULT Appellant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on February 8, 2006. Judgement delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 10, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. Date: 20060210 Docket: A-71-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 63 CORAM: RICHARD C.J.A. NOËL J.A. NADON J.A. BETWEEN: PIERRE ARCHAMBAULT Appellant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY (ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA) Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT RICHARD C.J.A.: [1] This is an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court rendered on February 7, 2005 [2005 FC 183], dismissing with costs the application for judicial review filed by the appellant Pierre Archambault against a decision rendered on March 24, 2003 by Léo-Paul Guindon, a designated adjudicator, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction under section 92 of the Public Service Staff Relations Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-35. [2] The appellant seeks to have the Federal Court decision, including the order as to costs, quashed and to have the case returned to an adjudicator of the Public Service Labour Relations Board. [3] We do not see any error in the decision of the Federal Court warranting our intervention. [4] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. “J. Richard” Chief Justice “I concur. Marc Noël J.A.” “I concur. Nadon J.A.” Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-71-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: PIERRE ARCHAMBAULT v. CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: February 8, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT BY: Richard C.J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: Noël J.A. Nadon J.A. DATED: February 10, 2006 APPEARANCES: Pierre Archambault Representing himself FOR THE APPELLANT Raymond Piché FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Representing himself FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca