Leskiw v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Leskiw v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-08 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 53 File numbers A-235-05 Decision Content Date: 20060208 Docket: A-235-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2006. Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, on February 8, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20060208 Docket: A-235-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] The appellant has failed to demonstrate that Snider J. erred or unreasonably exercised her discretion to deny his March 8, 2005 application to extend time for judicial review of a decision of the Minister of January 9, 2001 to deny his application for retroactive payments of CPP benefits. [2] The appeal should be dismissed. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. "I agree K. Sharlow J.A." "I agree B. Malone J.A." FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-235-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: February 7, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. DATED: February …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Leskiw v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-02-08 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 53 File numbers A-235-05 Decision Content Date: 20060208 Docket: A-235-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2006. Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, on February 8, 2006. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. Date: 20060208 Docket: A-235-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] The appellant has failed to demonstrate that Snider J. erred or unreasonably exercised her discretion to deny his March 8, 2005 application to extend time for judicial review of a decision of the Minister of January 9, 2001 to deny his application for retroactive payments of CPP benefits. [2] The appeal should be dismissed. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. "I agree K. Sharlow J.A." "I agree B. Malone J.A." FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-235-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: DANNY LESKIW Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: February 7, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. DATED: February 8, 2006 APPEARANCES: Danny Leskiw FOR THE APPELLANT Adrian Joseph FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Danny Leskiw Etobicoke, Ontario John H. Simms, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa FOR THE APPELLANT FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca