Séguin v. Canada
Court headnote
Séguin v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-04-16 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 155 File numbers A-741-01 Decision Content Date: 20040416 Docket: A-741-01 Citation: 2004 FCA 155 Between: MARTIN SÉGUIN AND NANCY BOUCHER DBA A.A. BOUCHER SABLAGE ENR. Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of costs pursuant to the order delivered by Décary, Nadon and Pelletier JJ.A. on March 10, 2003, allowing the motion to dismiss the application and dismissing the application for judicial review, with costs to the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on December 16, 2003, accompanied by a request for a decision without personal appearance of the parties. [3] The record indicates that the respondent's bill of costs was served on the applicants' counsel on December 12, 2003. [4] A schedule for the filing of submissions was drawn up and conveyed to the parties on January 12, 2004. No submission has been filed to date. In view of the foregoing, I am prepared to assess the costs in favour of the respondent. [5] The fees requested are allowed except in regard to the request under item 26 for the assessment of costs. Since the assessment of costs was not disputed, two units will be allowed for this item. [6] The disbursements in the amount of $24.42 are allowed as requested. [7] The respondent's costs are therefore assessed and allowed in t…
Read full judgment
Séguin v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-04-16 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 155 File numbers A-741-01 Decision Content Date: 20040416 Docket: A-741-01 Citation: 2004 FCA 155 Between: MARTIN SÉGUIN AND NANCY BOUCHER DBA A.A. BOUCHER SABLAGE ENR. Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an assessment of costs pursuant to the order delivered by Décary, Nadon and Pelletier JJ.A. on March 10, 2003, allowing the motion to dismiss the application and dismissing the application for judicial review, with costs to the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on December 16, 2003, accompanied by a request for a decision without personal appearance of the parties. [3] The record indicates that the respondent's bill of costs was served on the applicants' counsel on December 12, 2003. [4] A schedule for the filing of submissions was drawn up and conveyed to the parties on January 12, 2004. No submission has been filed to date. In view of the foregoing, I am prepared to assess the costs in favour of the respondent. [5] The fees requested are allowed except in regard to the request under item 26 for the assessment of costs. Since the assessment of costs was not disputed, two units will be allowed for this item. [6] The disbursements in the amount of $24.42 are allowed as requested. [7] The respondent's costs are therefore assessed and allowed in the amount of $794.42. "François Martin" FRANÇOIS MARTIN ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC April 16, 2004 Certified true translation Suzanne Gauthier, C.Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-741-01 Between: MARTIN SÉGUIN AND NANCY BOUCHER DBA A.A. BOUCHER SABLAGE ENR. Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: April 16, 2004 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Carignan, Séguin for the applicants Le Gardeur, Quebec Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca