Emmanuel v. Canada
Court headnote
Emmanuel v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-10-30 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 1123 File numbers 01-T-28 Decision Content Date: 20021030 Docket: 01-T-28 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 1123 Between: OCTAVIO EMMANUEL Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This assessment of costs is pursuant to the order of the Court rendered on September 21, 2001, dismissing a motion to extend the period for service and filing of an application for judicial review, with costs in favour of the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on August 29, 2002, together with a request for a decision without personal appearance by the parties. [3] On September 9, 2002, a copy of the respondent's bill of costs was sent to the appellant so that it could submit written representations, but as of today it has not done so. In light of the foregoing, I am ready to assess the costs in favour of the respondent. [4] The fees sought are allowed except for the request under item 26 for assessment of costs. The assessment of costs is not contested, so 2 units are allowed. [5] The disbursements are allowed as requested. [6] The costs of the respondent are therefore assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,027.48. A certificate will be issued in that amount. "François Martin" Assessment officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC October 30, 2002 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C.Tr., LL.L. FEDERA…
Read full judgment
Emmanuel v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-10-30 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 1123 File numbers 01-T-28 Decision Content Date: 20021030 Docket: 01-T-28 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 1123 Between: OCTAVIO EMMANUEL Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This assessment of costs is pursuant to the order of the Court rendered on September 21, 2001, dismissing a motion to extend the period for service and filing of an application for judicial review, with costs in favour of the respondent. [2] Counsel for the respondent filed his bill of costs on August 29, 2002, together with a request for a decision without personal appearance by the parties. [3] On September 9, 2002, a copy of the respondent's bill of costs was sent to the appellant so that it could submit written representations, but as of today it has not done so. In light of the foregoing, I am ready to assess the costs in favour of the respondent. [4] The fees sought are allowed except for the request under item 26 for assessment of costs. The assessment of costs is not contested, so 2 units are allowed. [5] The disbursements are allowed as requested. [6] The costs of the respondent are therefore assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,027.48. A certificate will be issued in that amount. "François Martin" Assessment officer MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC October 30, 2002 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C.Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20021030 Docket: 01-T-28 BETWEEN: OCTAVIO EMMANUEL Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET NO: 01-T-28 STYLE: OCTAVIO EMMANUEL and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF FRANÇOIS MARTIN, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: October 30, 2002 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Semeniuk & Gagnon Montréal, Quebec for the appellant Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario for the respondent
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca