Stewart v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Stewart v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-05-30 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 214 File numbers A-476-06 Decision Content Date: 20070530 Docket: A-476-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: GREGORY STEWART Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20070530 Docket: A-476-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: GREGORY STEWART Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007) NADON J.A. [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Pension Appeals Board (the Board) dated October 5, 2006 which concluded that the medical evidence before it did not show that the applicant’s disability was severe and prolonged within the meaning given to those terms by the Canada Pension Plan. [2] We have not been persuaded that in so concluding the Board erred either in fact or in law. We would add that, in our view, it was clearly open to the Board, considering the evidence before it, to conclude as it did. [3] We are therefore all agreed that the application should be dismissed but, in the circumstances, without costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Stewart v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-05-30 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 214 File numbers A-476-06 Decision Content Date: 20070530 Docket: A-476-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: GREGORY STEWART Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20070530 Docket: A-476-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: GREGORY STEWART Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 30, 2007) NADON J.A. [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Pension Appeals Board (the Board) dated October 5, 2006 which concluded that the medical evidence before it did not show that the applicant’s disability was severe and prolonged within the meaning given to those terms by the Canada Pension Plan. [2] We have not been persuaded that in so concluding the Board erred either in fact or in law. We would add that, in our view, it was clearly open to the Board, considering the evidence before it, to conclude as it did. [3] We are therefore all agreed that the application should be dismissed but, in the circumstances, without costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-476-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: GREGORY STEWART v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Halifax, Nova Scotia DATE OF HEARING: May 30, 2007 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Nadon J.A. Pelletier J.A. Ryer J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Nadon J.A. APPEARANCES: Gregory Stewart Halifax, N.S. On his own behalf Jacques-Michel Cyr Ottawa, ON FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca