Canada (Attorney General) v. Hutchison
Court headnote
Canada (Attorney General) v. Hutchison Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-11 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 105 File numbers A-199-03 Decision Content Date: 20040311 Docket: A-199-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 105 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JOSEPH HUTCHISON Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A. Date: 20040311 Docket: A-199-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 105 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JOSEPH HUTCHISON Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004) EVANS J.A. [1] We are all of the view that this application for judicial review must be dismissed. [2] The Attorney General argues that the Pension Appeals Board erred in law in concluding that Mr. Hutchison's minimum qualifying period ended on December 31, 1992, rather than on December 31, 1994. Even if he is right on this, we are not persuaded that the error is material and warrants the intervention of this Court. The record reveals that Mr. Hutchison has continually complained of lower back pain since he suffered injuries at work in the mid and late 1980s, and has regularly consulted doctors about his back. [3] Nor are we satisfied that, on the basis of the evidence before it, the Board's d…
Read full judgment
Canada (Attorney General) v. Hutchison Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-11 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 105 File numbers A-199-03 Decision Content Date: 20040311 Docket: A-199-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 105 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JOSEPH HUTCHISON Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A. Date: 20040311 Docket: A-199-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 105 CORAM: SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JOSEPH HUTCHISON Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004) EVANS J.A. [1] We are all of the view that this application for judicial review must be dismissed. [2] The Attorney General argues that the Pension Appeals Board erred in law in concluding that Mr. Hutchison's minimum qualifying period ended on December 31, 1992, rather than on December 31, 1994. Even if he is right on this, we are not persuaded that the error is material and warrants the intervention of this Court. The record reveals that Mr. Hutchison has continually complained of lower back pain since he suffered injuries at work in the mid and late 1980s, and has regularly consulted doctors about his back. [3] Nor are we satisfied that, on the basis of the evidence before it, the Board's decision that Mr. Hutchison was suffering from a severe and prolonged disability was patently unreasonable or, in the words of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, paragraph 18.1(4)(d), was made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it. [4] For these reasons, the application will be dismissed with costs. J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-199-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. JOSEPH HUTCHISON PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO , ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 11, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (SEXTON, EVANS AND SHARLOW JJ.A.) RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY EVANS J.A. APPEARANCES: Stuart Herbert FOR THE APPLICANT Steven Yormak FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE APPLICANT Yormak & Yormak Barristers & Solicitors London, ON FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca