Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Canada· 1929

Brettingen v. Evans and McKay

[1930] SCR 121
CriminalJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Brettingen v. Evans and McKay Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1929-10-08 Report [1930] SCR 121 Judges Anglin, Francis Alexander; Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Smith, Robert On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Brettingen v. Evans and McKay, [1930] S.C.R. 121 Date: 1929-10-08 Brettingen; v. Evans and McKay 1929: October 8. Present:—Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret and Smith JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA Malicious prosecution—Want of reasonable and probable cause—Malice —Findings as to ownership of chattels—Damages for wrongful detention. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], dismissing (subject to certain variations of the judgment below) his appeal from the judgment of Boyle J. in favour of the plaintiffs as to the ownership of certain chattels and for damages against the defendant for wrongful taking and unjust detention thereof and for damages for malicious prosecution. At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the Court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. [1] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 1. …

Read full judgment
Brettingen v. Evans and McKay
Collection
Supreme Court Judgments
Date
1929-10-08
Report
[1930] SCR 121
Judges
Anglin, Francis Alexander; Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Smith, Robert
On appeal from
Alberta
Subjects
Criminal law
Decision Content
Supreme Court of Canada
Brettingen v. Evans and McKay, [1930] S.C.R. 121
Date: 1929-10-08
Brettingen;
v.
Evans and McKay
1929: October 8.
Present:—Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret and Smith JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA
Malicious prosecution—Want of reasonable and probable cause—Malice —Findings as to ownership of chattels—Damages for wrongful detention. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], dismissing (subject to certain variations of the judgment below) his appeal from the judgment of Boyle J. in favour of the plaintiffs as to the ownership of certain chattels and for damages against the defendant for wrongful taking and unjust detention thereof and for damages for malicious prosecution. At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the Court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
[1] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 1.

Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca

Related cases