Brettingen v. Evans and McKay
Court headnote
Brettingen v. Evans and McKay Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1929-10-08 Report [1930] SCR 121 Judges Anglin, Francis Alexander; Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Smith, Robert On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Brettingen v. Evans and McKay, [1930] S.C.R. 121 Date: 1929-10-08 Brettingen; v. Evans and McKay 1929: October 8. Present:—Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret and Smith JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA Malicious prosecution—Want of reasonable and probable cause—Malice —Findings as to ownership of chattels—Damages for wrongful detention. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], dismissing (subject to certain variations of the judgment below) his appeal from the judgment of Boyle J. in favour of the plaintiffs as to the ownership of certain chattels and for damages against the defendant for wrongful taking and unjust detention thereof and for damages for malicious prosecution. At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the Court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. [1] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 1. …
Read full judgment
Brettingen v. Evans and McKay Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1929-10-08 Report [1930] SCR 121 Judges Anglin, Francis Alexander; Duff, Lyman Poore; Newcombe, Edmund Leslie; Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Smith, Robert On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Brettingen v. Evans and McKay, [1930] S.C.R. 121 Date: 1929-10-08 Brettingen; v. Evans and McKay 1929: October 8. Present:—Anglin C.J.C. and Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret and Smith JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA Malicious prosecution—Want of reasonable and probable cause—Malice —Findings as to ownership of chattels—Damages for wrongful detention. APPEAL by the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta[1], dismissing (subject to certain variations of the judgment below) his appeal from the judgment of Boyle J. in favour of the plaintiffs as to the ownership of certain chattels and for damages against the defendant for wrongful taking and unjust detention thereof and for damages for malicious prosecution. At the conclusion of the argument of counsel for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the Court orally delivered judgment dismissing the appeal with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. [1] [1929] 1 W.W.R. 1.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca