R. v. Jones
Court headnote
R. v. Jones Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-02-02 Report [1993] 1 SCR 460 Case number 22400 Judges La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from Saskatchewan Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 22400 Decision Content R. v. Jones, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 460 Glenn Ivor Jones Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Jones File No.: 22400. 1993: February 2. Present: La Forest, Sopinka, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for saskatchewan Criminal law ‑‑ Appeals to Supreme Court of Canada ‑‑ Appeal as of right from conviction ‑‑ Dissent in Court of Appeal not on question of law ‑‑ Appeal dismissed ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). APPEAL from a judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (1991), 89 Sask. R. 214, 64 C.C.C. (3d) 181, dismissing the accused's appeal from his conviction by Grotsky J. on a charge of possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking. Appeal dismissed. William H. Roe, for the appellant. Michael R. Dambrot, Q.C., and Douglas G. Curliss, for the respondent. //La Forest J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by La Forest J. ‑‑ We are all of the view that there was not a dissent on a question of law within the meaning of s. 691(1) (a) of the Criminal Code . The appeal is therefore dismissed. Judgment…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Jones Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-02-02 Report [1993] 1 SCR 460 Case number 22400 Judges La Forest, Gérard V.; Sopinka, John; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from Saskatchewan Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 22400 Decision Content R. v. Jones, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 460 Glenn Ivor Jones Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Jones File No.: 22400. 1993: February 2. Present: La Forest, Sopinka, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for saskatchewan Criminal law ‑‑ Appeals to Supreme Court of Canada ‑‑ Appeal as of right from conviction ‑‑ Dissent in Court of Appeal not on question of law ‑‑ Appeal dismissed ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 691(1) (a). APPEAL from a judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (1991), 89 Sask. R. 214, 64 C.C.C. (3d) 181, dismissing the accused's appeal from his conviction by Grotsky J. on a charge of possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking. Appeal dismissed. William H. Roe, for the appellant. Michael R. Dambrot, Q.C., and Douglas G. Curliss, for the respondent. //La Forest J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by La Forest J. ‑‑ We are all of the view that there was not a dissent on a question of law within the meaning of s. 691(1) (a) of the Criminal Code . The appeal is therefore dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Roe & Olson, Saskatoon. Solicitor for the respondent: The Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca