R. v. Blake
Court headnote
R. v. Blake Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2004-10-29 Neutral citation 2004 SCC 69 Report [2004] 3 SCR 503 Case number 30098 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 30098 Decision Content R. v. Blake, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 503, 2004 SCC 69 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Randolph Blake Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Blake Neutral citation: 2004 SCC 69. File No.: 30098. 2004: October 15; 2004: October 29. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law — Evidence — Similar fact evidence — Admissibility — Sexual offences. Cases Cited Referred to: R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (2003), 68 O.R. (3d) 75 (sub nom. R. v. B. (R.)), 181 C.C.C. (3d) 169, 179 O.A.C. 137, [2003] O.J. No. 4589 (QL), quashing the accused’s conviction for sexual offences and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. Shelley Hallett, for the appellant. Nicholas A. Xynnis, for the respondent. The following is the judgment delivered by 1 The Court — As the majority judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal points out, the trial judge did not have the benefit of this Court’s reasons in R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56. The Court is in agreement with the judgment o…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Blake Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2004-10-29 Neutral citation 2004 SCC 69 Report [2004] 3 SCR 503 Case number 30098 Judges McLachlin, Beverley; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 30098 Decision Content R. v. Blake, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 503, 2004 SCC 69 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Randolph Blake Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Blake Neutral citation: 2004 SCC 69. File No.: 30098. 2004: October 15; 2004: October 29. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law — Evidence — Similar fact evidence — Admissibility — Sexual offences. Cases Cited Referred to: R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (2003), 68 O.R. (3d) 75 (sub nom. R. v. B. (R.)), 181 C.C.C. (3d) 169, 179 O.A.C. 137, [2003] O.J. No. 4589 (QL), quashing the accused’s conviction for sexual offences and ordering a new trial. Appeal dismissed. Shelley Hallett, for the appellant. Nicholas A. Xynnis, for the respondent. The following is the judgment delivered by 1 The Court — As the majority judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal points out, the trial judge did not have the benefit of this Court’s reasons in R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56. The Court is in agreement with the judgment of the majority of the Court of Appeal: (2003), 68 O.R. (3d) 75. The appeal is dismissed and the order for a new trial confirmed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: Nicholas A. Xynnis, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca