Hébert v. The Queen
Court headnote
Hébert v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1981-03-23 Report [1981] 1 SCR 361 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hébert v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 361 Date: 1981-03-23 Maurice S. Hébert Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1981: March 23. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR QUEBEC Criminal law—Fraud and conspiracy charge—Credibility of accused’s testimony—Conviction—Criminal Code, ss. 338(1), 423(1)(d). APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec[1], dismissing with a dissent an appeal by appellant and upholding his conviction on counts of fraud and conspiracy. Michel Proulx, for the appellant. Yves Berthiaume, for the respondent. English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—The detailed arguments submitted on behalf of the appellant have not persuaded us that the judgment of the Court of Appeal is ill-founded. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal. Solicitor for the respondent: Y. Berthiaume, Montreal. [1] [1979] C.A. 434. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Hébert v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1981-03-23 Report [1981] 1 SCR 361 Judges Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Hébert v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 361 Date: 1981-03-23 Maurice S. Hébert Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1981: March 23. Present: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR QUEBEC Criminal law—Fraud and conspiracy charge—Credibility of accused’s testimony—Conviction—Criminal Code, ss. 338(1), 423(1)(d). APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec[1], dismissing with a dissent an appeal by appellant and upholding his conviction on counts of fraud and conspiracy. Michel Proulx, for the appellant. Yves Berthiaume, for the respondent. English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by MARTLAND J.—The detailed arguments submitted on behalf of the appellant have not persuaded us that the judgment of the Court of Appeal is ill-founded. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Proulx, Barot & Dupuis, Montreal. Solicitor for the respondent: Y. Berthiaume, Montreal. [1] [1979] C.A. 434.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca