Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2005

Didone v. Sakno

2005 FCA 62
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Didone v. Sakno Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-02-15 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 62 File numbers A-42-04 Decision Content Date: 20050215 Docket: A-42-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 62 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE Appellants and MICHAEL PETER SAKNO Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A. Date: 20050215 Docket: A-42-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 62 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE Appellants and MICHAEL PETER SAKNO Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005). EVANS J.A. [1] We are not persuaded that Russell J. committed any error warranting the intervention of this Court when he dismissed the Appellants' application for judicial review. [2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $ 4,000 inclusive of disbursements and GST. "John M. Evans" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-42-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE Appellants and MICHAEL PETER SAKNO Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: FEBRUARY 15, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON, EVANS JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: EVANS J.A. APPEARANCES: Frank Farfan …

Read full judgment
Didone v. Sakno
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-02-15
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 62
File numbers
A-42-04
Decision Content
Date: 20050215
Docket: A-42-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 62
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE
Appellants
and
MICHAEL PETER SAKNO
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A.
Date: 20050215
Docket: A-42-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 62
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE
Appellants
and
MICHAEL PETER SAKNO
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 15, 2005).
EVANS J.A.
[1] We are not persuaded that Russell J. committed any error warranting the intervention of this Court when he dismissed the Appellants' application for judicial review.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $ 4,000 inclusive of disbursements and GST. "John M. Evans"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-42-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: BRIAN M. DIDONE and MANFRED HARLE
Appellants
and
MICHAEL PETER SAKNO
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: FEBRUARY 15, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON, EVANS JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: EVANS J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Frank Farfan For the Appellant
William J.Genereux For Respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Macbeth & Johnson For the Appellant
Toronto, Ontario
William J. Genereux For the Respondent
Toronto, Ontario

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases