R. v. Clutterbuck
Court headnote
R. v. Clutterbuck Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-06-08 Report [1993] 2 SCR 447 Case number 23025 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 23025 Decision Content R. v. Clutterbuck, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 447 Timothy Clutterbuck Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Clutterbuck File No.: 23025. 1993: June 8. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Perjury ‑‑ Corroboration ‑‑ Corroboration not required when proof rests on inferences drawn from conduct. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissing appeals against the conviction and the sentence by MacLeod J. (1991), 13 W.C.B. (2d) 333. Appeal dismissed. Keith E. Wright, for the appellant. John Corelli, for the respondent. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. ‑‑ Speaking for the Court, we find no merit in any of the grounds of appeal and, accordingly, dismiss this appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Keith E. Wright, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Clutterbuck Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-06-08 Report [1993] 2 SCR 447 Case number 23025 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 23025 Decision Content R. v. Clutterbuck, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 447 Timothy Clutterbuck Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Clutterbuck File No.: 23025. 1993: June 8. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Perjury ‑‑ Corroboration ‑‑ Corroboration not required when proof rests on inferences drawn from conduct. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissing appeals against the conviction and the sentence by MacLeod J. (1991), 13 W.C.B. (2d) 333. Appeal dismissed. Keith E. Wright, for the appellant. John Corelli, for the respondent. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. ‑‑ Speaking for the Court, we find no merit in any of the grounds of appeal and, accordingly, dismiss this appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Keith E. Wright, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca