Mortgages — creation and priorities
Creation of legal and equitable mortgages, the equity of redemption, and the priority rules under the Law of Property Act 1925 and Land Registration Act 2002.
Overview
Mortgages are the principal proprietary security interest in land. A mortgagor (typically the owner-occupier or commercial borrower) grants a mortgage to a mortgagee (typically a bank or building society) as security for a loan. The mortgagee acquires proprietary rights against the land that bind successors; the mortgagor retains the right to redeem (recover the land) on repayment.
This week studies the doctrinal architecture of mortgages in three layers. (i) Creation: legal mortgages by deed (LPA 1925 s 87 — charge by way of legal mortgage), equitable mortgages (equitable charges; mortgages of equitable interests; anomalous equitable mortgages by deposit of title deeds, abolished by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s 2). (ii) The equity of redemption: the mortgagor''s right to redeem on repayment, protected by equity from clogs and fetters. (iii) Priorities: the rules governing competing mortgages — registered charges under the Land Registration Act 2002, the tabula in naufragio principle for unregistered land, and the rules on tacking.
The topic connects to W2 (registered title; the position of mortgages in the LRA 2002 architecture), W3 (priorities and overreaching), W14 (mortgagee''s remedies — the consequences of default), and to the law of contract (the underlying loan).
Historical context
Mortgages have been a feature of English land law since the medieval period. The original form was the gage of land — the borrower transferred legal title to the lender with a covenant to reconvey on repayment. The form was reformed by the Conveyancing Act 1881 and consolidated by the Law of Property Act 1925, which abolished the conveyance form and introduced the statutory charge by way of legal mortgage (s 87).
The equity of redemption emerged in the late seventeenth century as the courts of equity developed protections for mortgagors against forfeiture for technical default. The principle that ''once a mortgage, always a mortgage'' protects the mortgagor''s right to redeem on payment of the debt. The clog-on-the-equity-of-redemption rule (Salt v Marquess of Northampton [1892] AC 1; Samuel v Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Corp [1904] AC 323) prevents agreements that would prevent or unduly fetter the right to redeem.
The Land Registration Act 2002 introduced electronic conveyancing in concept and modernised the priority rules for registered mortgages. The post-2002 case-law has worked out the operation of the new regime, particularly the registered-charge priority rules in Schedule 3 LRA 2002.
Key principles
(1) Legal mortgages. A legal mortgage of land must be created by deed (LPA 1925 s 52). Section 87 introduced the charge by way of legal mortgage as the standard form: the mortgagor charges their estate as security for the loan; legal title remains with the mortgagor. Pre-2002 alternative forms (lease for 3000 years; sub-lease less one day) were preserved by the LRA 2002 as available for unregistered land but not for registered land, where only the s 87 charge by way of legal mortgage is available.
Statutory framework
Law of Property Act 1925. Section 52 — deeds required for creation of legal estates. Section 85 — long-lease form of mortgage (preserved for unregistered land). Section 86 — sub-lease form of mortgage (also preserved).
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Landmark cases
Salt v Marquess of Northampton [1892] AC 1. The House of Lords held that the equity of redemption cannot be clogged or fettered. A provision in a mortgage allowing the mortgagee to purchase the property on default was struck down. The case is the foundational authority on the no-clog rule.
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
RatioFoundational authority on the no-clog rule.
RatioApplied even though the option had been agreed contemporaneously with the mortgage.
RatioThe no-clog rule is applied more flexibly in commercial than in consumer contexts.
RatioModern application of the no-clog rule from Salt v Northampton.
Doctrinal development
Pre-LRA 2002 architecture. The Land Registration Act 1925 governed registered land; the Land Charges Act 1972 governed unregistered land.
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Academic debates
The no-clog rule. Whether the rule has continuing relevance. The traditionalist view (Megarry and Wade) is that the rule preserves the integrity of the mortgage relationship and prevents oppression.
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Comparative perspective
United States — mortgage and deed-of-trust models. American mortgage law varies by state: some states use mortgag
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Worked tutorial essay
Question. ''The doctrine of the equity of redemption has produced a doctrinal protection for mortgagors that is no longer needed in the modern commercial context. The Knightsbridge Estates decision should be extended.'' Discuss.
Plan. Test (a) the no-clog protection''s function; (b) the Knightsbridge approach for commercial mortgages; (c) whether further extension is appropriate.
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Common exam traps
Five recurring errors. First, treating mortgages as sales rather than security interests.
Pro members see the full notes including statute extracts, case quotes, worked tutorial essays, and practice questions.
Practice questions
Five graded practice questions in the panel below.
Further reading
See the Further Reading panel for Megarry and Wade, Gray and Gray, Sykes on Law of Securities, and the post-LRA 2002 academic commentary.
Practice questions
Explain the difference between a legal and an equitable mortgage of land.
What is the equity of redemption and how is it protected by the no-clog rule?
Further reading
- Megarry and Wade, The Law of Real Property
- Kevin Gray and Susan Francis Gray, Elements of Land Law
- Sykes and Walker, The Law of Securities
- Sarah Worthington, Equity
- Law Commission, Land Mortgages (Report No 204)
- Mark Pawlowski, Mortgages and the Equity of Redemption
- Charles Harpum, Stuart Bridge, and Martin Dixon, Megarry and Wade: The Law of Real Property
- Roger Smith, Property Law