Constitutional law, rights and democracy
Should decisions about basic human rights be made by democratically elected legislators or by judges interpreting a Bill of Rights?
LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan
The essay question
Should decisions about basic human rights — such as fair trial, free speech, freedom from torture, and non-discrimination — be made by democratically elected legislators or by judges interpreting a Bill of Rights?
The plan
Stance
Judges interpreting a Bill of Rights should have the final word, though legislatures remain vital participants.
Definitions
- Basic human rights: Non-derogable or foundational rights (fair trial, free speech, freedom from torture, equality). Rights that underpin democratic legitimacy itself.
- Democratically elected legislators: Bodies with electoral legitimacy to represent majority will (e.g. UK Parliament, US Congress).
- Judges interpreting a Bill of Rights: A formal constitutional document (or entrenched section) that enumerates and protects fundamental rights against government interference, empowering courts to review and, where necessary, strike down legislation that violates those rights.
- Interpretation: Not mechanical application, but reasoned elaboration of rights in specific contexts.
Assumptions Under Challenge
Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.
Sign up and unlock