Skip to main content

Constitutional law, rights and democracy

Should decisions about basic human rights be made by democratically elected legislators or by judges interpreting a Bill of Rights?

LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan

The essay question

Should decisions about basic human rights — such as fair trial, free speech, freedom from torture, and non-discrimination — be made by democratically elected legislators or by judges interpreting a Bill of Rights?

The plan

Stance

Judges interpreting a Bill of Rights should have the final word, though legislatures remain vital participants.

Definitions

  • Basic human rights: Non-derogable or foundational rights (fair trial, free speech, freedom from torture, equality). Rights that underpin democratic legitimacy itself.
  • Democratically elected legislators: Bodies with electoral legitimacy to represent majority will (e.g. UK Parliament, US Congress).
  • Judges interpreting a Bill of Rights: A formal constitutional document (or entrenched section) that enumerates and protects fundamental rights against government interference, empowering courts to review and, where necessary, strike down legislation that violates those rights.
  • Interpretation: Not mechanical application, but reasoned elaboration of rights in specific contexts.

Assumptions Under Challenge

Read the full plan

Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.

Sign up and unlock
Elite · Caselaw atelier

Generate a model essay from this plan

Turn this plan into a finished essay, instantly.

Elite turns the founder's plan into a complete, 500–600 word Section B model essay written to the structure above — a clear stance, distinct points, a steel-manned counter and a tight finish. Generate, read, regenerate.

Sign up and unlock