Constitutional law & democracy
Who Should Have the Final Say on Human Rights: Elected Officials or Constitutional Courts?
LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan
The essay question
Who should have the final say on human rights: elected officials or constitutional courts?
The plan
Stance
Against giving elected officials the final say — constitutional courts must have supremacy, because majoritarian institutions cannot be trusted to always respect rights. Counters are steelmanned to show awareness of democratic legitimacy.
Definitions (stance-aware)
- Final say: The ultimate authority to interpret and enforce human rights norms when conflict arises — not just advisory power.
- Elected officials: Legislators or executives deriving authority from democratic mandate; legitimacy rests on popular sovereignty.
- Constitutional courts: Judicial bodies empowered to strike down laws or acts that violate entrenched human rights; legitimacy rests on rule of law, impartiality, and constitutional supremacy.
- Human rights: Norms protecting fundamental dignity, liberty, and equality, deliberately resistant to simple majoritarian override.
Assumptions under challenge
Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.
Sign up and unlock