Criminal justice and sentencing
Are mandatory minimum sentences for drug offences an effective way to combat drug abuse?
LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan
The essay question
Are mandatory minimum sentences for drug offences an effective way to combat drug abuse?
The plan
Stance
Against — they are empirically ineffective, economically irrational, socially corrosive, and philosophically misguided.
Jurisdiction: UK–US comparative with brief reference to European reform (e.g. Portugal). Word target: ~750.
Definitions
- Mandatory minimum sentences: Statutory requirements that impose fixed minimum penalties for specific offences, removing judicial discretion.
- Effectiveness: Whether the policy meaningfully reduces drug abuse and its societal harms.
- Drug abuse: The chronic, compulsive use of substances in a manner harmful to the individual or society.
Assumptions Under Challenge
- That drug abuse is a rational choice responsive to deterrence.
- That harsher punishment produces social benefit.
- That justice requires uniformity rather than proportionality.
Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.
Sign up and unlock