Euthanasia, autonomy and medical ethics
Should euthanasia be legalized for patients with terminal illnesses?
LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan
The essay question
Should euthanasia be legalized for patients with terminal illnesses?
The plan
Stance: Yes, euthanasia should be legalized (with safeguards).
Jurisdiction focus: UK (with comparative ECHR, Netherlands, Belgium, Canada). Word target: 750.
Definitions
- Euthanasia: intentional ending of a patient's life by a physician at their voluntary, informed request, in order to relieve unbearable suffering.
- Terminal illness: a condition certified by medical professionals as incurable and leading to death within a defined period.
- Legalized: recognised and regulated by law, not merely tolerated; carried out with safeguards (consent, medical oversight, review boards).
- Fair framing: This essay is about whether law should prioritise autonomy and relief of suffering or protection of life and prevention of abuse.
Assumptions Under Challenge
- That the sanctity of life is absolute and cannot be overridden by autonomy or quality of life.
- That legalising euthanasia inevitably leads to a slippery slope: from voluntary to involuntary, from terminal to non-terminal.
- That palliative care can always relieve suffering adequately.
- That vulnerable patients cannot consent freely due to coercion or despair.
Read the full plan
Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.
Sign up and unlock