Skip to main content

Hate speech, free expression and equality

Should laws criminalising hate speech be repealed in favour of absolute freedom of expression?

LNAT Section B · Founder's essay plan

The essay question

Should laws criminalising hate speech be repealed in favour of absolute freedom of expression?

The plan

Stance: No. Hate speech laws should not be repealed. Absolute freedom of expression risks silencing vulnerable groups, eroding democratic equality, and weaponising speech as a tool of subjugation.

Definitions (stance-aware)

  • Hate speech: Expression that incites violence, hostility, or discrimination against groups defined by race, religion, sexuality, gender, or similar protected characteristics.
  • Absolute freedom of expression: A libertarian conception of speech, unfettered by content-based restrictions, even where it harms or marginalises others.
  • Repeal: Abolishing statutory restrictions (e.g., UK Public Order Act 1986, Germany's Volksverhetzung laws).

Framing: The debate is not about censoring unpopular opinion, but about whether speech that corrodes equality can claim protection as "freedom."

Assumptions under challenge

Read the full plan

Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full — the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.

Sign up and unlock
Elite · Caselaw atelier

Generate a model essay from this plan

Turn this plan into a finished essay, instantly.

Elite turns the founder's plan into a complete, 500–600 word Section B model essay written to the structure above — a clear stance, distinct points, a steel-manned counter and a tight finish. Generate, read, regenerate.

Sign up and unlock