Skip to main content

Open justice & the courts

Can There Be Valid Reasons for Withholding Information from the Public During a Trial?

LNAT Section B ยท Founder's essay plan

The essay question

Can there be valid reasons for withholding information from the public during a trial? If so, under what circumstances?

The plan

Stance

Yes โ€” but only in exceptional, judicially supervised cases.

  • Jurisdiction focus: UK/ECHR with comparative references (US, Canada).
  • Word target: 750.

Definitions

  • Withholding information: Preventing disclosure of some material to the public (media, observers) while still allowing its use in the trial. Includes anonymisation, redactions, reporting restrictions, and closed material procedures.
  • Valid reasons: Ethically defensible and legally principled justifications that respect Article 6 ECHR (fair trial) and the principle of open justice.
  • Public trial principle: Rooted in Scott v Scott [1913]: "justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done."

Assumptions under challenge

Read the full plan

Elite unlocks every founder's LNAT essay plan in full โ€” the thesis, distinct points, steel-manned counter and the line of argument behind the model answer.

Sign up and unlock
Elite ยท Caselaw atelier

Generate a model essay from this plan

Turn this plan into a finished essay, instantly.

Elite turns the founder's plan into a complete, 500โ€“600 word Section B model essay written to the structure above โ€” a clear stance, distinct points, a steel-manned counter and a tight finish. Generate, read, regenerate.

Sign up and unlock