R (on the application of Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice
United Kingdom Supreme Court[2013] UKSC 631 Jan 2013· General
Two life-sentenced prisoners challenged their exclusion from voting. Chester relied on ECHR Article 3 Protocol 1 and EU law for UK/European Parliamentary elections; McGeoch relied on EU law for local/Scottish elections. Both had completed tariff periods but remained imprisoned. The Supreme Court upheld dismissals, holding that blanket prisoner disenfranchisement does not violate incorporated ECHR rights or EU law, and courts cannot mandate legislative implementation of Hirst v UK.