“Application under Schedule 4 of the 2002 Act to remove an area of land adjacent to the North Walsham and Dilham Canal from the title plan of the Respondent's land on the grounds that the land had bee…”
You're reading the free summary of The Old Canal Company Limited v James Russell Tate (Alteration and rectification of the register : Mistake). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.