“Opinion (per Lord Young) that the risk of accidental loss in such a case lay upon the owner and not upon the custodier, and that in order to make the latter liable he must be shown to have been in fa…”
You're reading the free summary of Sutherland v. Hutton. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.