“His Lordship added the following note: ‘The Lord Ordinary certainly thinks this case attended with difficulty; and if it did not appear to him that the statute is imperative, he would not have found …”
You're reading the free summary of ALEXANDER INNERARITY and Company v Mrs MARY MOFFAT or GILMORE and Husband (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.