“Observations ( per Lord Stormonth Darling, Ordinary, and Lord Adam) on the proof of usage necessary to explain a custom of trade expressly referred to in a contract, as contrasted with that necessary…”
You're reading the free summary of Douglas & Co. v. Stiven. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.